<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Experiment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://calibersf.com/2010/02/08/an-experiment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://calibersf.com/2010/02/08/an-experiment/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:57:57 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bhautik</title>
		<link>http://calibersf.com/2010/02/08/an-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-10331</link>
		<dc:creator>bhautik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calibersf.com/?p=3410#comment-10331</guid>
		<description>Another option instead of using filters is to keep the camera as still as possible, take lots of images, put them into a stack and run a median filter over it, which can give a really sharp result. Photoshop CS3, CS4 support this feature: http://www.creativetechs.com/iq/photoshop_cs3s_automatic_people_remover.html

If you don&#039;t choose your images carefully, though, you will end up with a lot of messy little artifacts around the edges of removed people. I&#039;d still go with the ND-filters if you can :)

There is also plenty you can do without filters - see:

http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/04/predawn-images-of-an-eerily-empty-city/
http://www.flickr.com/groups/lonelycity/pool/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ianvisits/sets/72157611633177884/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another option instead of using filters is to keep the camera as still as possible, take lots of images, put them into a stack and run a median filter over it, which can give a really sharp result. Photoshop CS3, CS4 support this feature: <a href="http://www.creativetechs.com/iq/photoshop_cs3s_automatic_people_remover.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.creativetechs.com/iq/photoshop_cs3s_automatic_people_remover.html</a></p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t choose your images carefully, though, you will end up with a lot of messy little artifacts around the edges of removed people. I&#8217;d still go with the ND-filters if you can <img src='http://calibersf.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>There is also plenty you can do without filters &#8211; see:</p>
<p><a href="http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/04/predawn-images-of-an-eerily-empty-city/" rel="nofollow">http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/04/predawn-images-of-an-eerily-empty-city/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/lonelycity/pool/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/groups/lonelycity/pool/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ianvisits/sets/72157611633177884/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/ianvisits/sets/72157611633177884/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rory</title>
		<link>http://calibersf.com/2010/02/08/an-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-10078</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calibersf.com/?p=3410#comment-10078</guid>
		<description>Maybe you could find a busy intersection on a steep enough hill where, if standing on the uphill side of the intersection, all of the parked cars are over the edge of the intersection (downhill).  I haven&#039;t lived in the city in a couple years so I can&#039;t think of a perfect intersection off of the top off my head, but maybe around nob hill/russian hill.  Actually, Union Square might also be good because, if I remember correctly, several of the streets don&#039;t allow parking on the street right there.  Plus it is always packed, so the effect of it being &quot;empty&quot; would be more pronounced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you could find a busy intersection on a steep enough hill where, if standing on the uphill side of the intersection, all of the parked cars are over the edge of the intersection (downhill).  I haven&#8217;t lived in the city in a couple years so I can&#8217;t think of a perfect intersection off of the top off my head, but maybe around nob hill/russian hill.  Actually, Union Square might also be good because, if I remember correctly, several of the streets don&#8217;t allow parking on the street right there.  Plus it is always packed, so the effect of it being &#8220;empty&#8221; would be more pronounced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://calibersf.com/2010/02/08/an-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-10063</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calibersf.com/?p=3410#comment-10063</guid>
		<description>Good question, one I have been debating. I could comp together multiple photographs at different time periods, but the stupid sun seems to move a lot during the day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question, one I have been debating. I could comp together multiple photographs at different time periods, but the stupid sun seems to move a lot during the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keoki</title>
		<link>http://calibersf.com/2010/02/08/an-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-10060</link>
		<dc:creator>keoki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calibersf.com/?p=3410#comment-10060</guid>
		<description>I think this idea would make an excellent self-portrait.  Standing in the middle of an &#039;empty&#039; street in san francisco</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this idea would make an excellent self-portrait.  Standing in the middle of an &#8216;empty&#8217; street in san francisco</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://calibersf.com/2010/02/08/an-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-10002</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calibersf.com/?p=3410#comment-10002</guid>
		<description>i like this line of thinking. how will you address parked cars?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like this line of thinking. how will you address parked cars?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://calibersf.com/2010/02/08/an-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-9958</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 07:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calibersf.com/?p=3410#comment-9958</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m thinking about trying some daytime long exposure shots. I was thinking about stacking neutral density filters, or trying to find a few that are extremely dense.

The idea I have is to shoot some busy spots in the city but effectively remove the people and cars, etc, by timing them out. I would really like to do like a 20 or 30 second shot in the middle of the day. I&#039;m think this weekend about seeking out some of these filters. Where should I go? Calumet? Gasser? I think these filters are like over $30 a piece.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking about trying some daytime long exposure shots. I was thinking about stacking neutral density filters, or trying to find a few that are extremely dense.</p>
<p>The idea I have is to shoot some busy spots in the city but effectively remove the people and cars, etc, by timing them out. I would really like to do like a 20 or 30 second shot in the middle of the day. I&#8217;m think this weekend about seeking out some of these filters. Where should I go? Calumet? Gasser? I think these filters are like over $30 a piece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://calibersf.com/2010/02/08/an-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-9953</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calibersf.com/?p=3410#comment-9953</guid>
		<description>we are going to need a pre-review as well as a hindsight on this campaign. ill throw a TB on your calender. however i realize that Outlook is misbehaving, thusly we&#039;ll have to have another meeting to discuss that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we are going to need a pre-review as well as a hindsight on this campaign. ill throw a TB on your calender. however i realize that Outlook is misbehaving, thusly we&#8217;ll have to have another meeting to discuss that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Brooks</title>
		<link>http://calibersf.com/2010/02/08/an-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-9945</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 04:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calibersf.com/?p=3410#comment-9945</guid>
		<description>Yeah, me too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, me too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://calibersf.com/2010/02/08/an-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-9944</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 04:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calibersf.com/?p=3410#comment-9944</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m also curious to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m also curious to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keoki</title>
		<link>http://calibersf.com/2010/02/08/an-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-9941</link>
		<dc:creator>keoki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calibersf.com/?p=3410#comment-9941</guid>
		<description>whatcha up to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whatcha up to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://calibersf.com/2010/02/08/an-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-9938</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calibersf.com/?p=3410#comment-9938</guid>
		<description>Considering you have a picture of Columbus up, you have my attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering you have a picture of Columbus up, you have my attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amber aka chipmonkey</title>
		<link>http://calibersf.com/2010/02/08/an-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-9937</link>
		<dc:creator>amber aka chipmonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calibersf.com/?p=3410#comment-9937</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m curious. on my deats edge, actually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m curious. on my deats edge, actually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
